Vor Ort
Merkzettel Warenkorb
Produktbild: Cato Supreme Court Review

Cato Supreme Court Review 2014-2015

13,99 €

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., zzgl. Versandkosten

  • Kostenlose Lieferung ab 30 € Einkaufswert
  • Versandkostenfrei für Bonuscard-Kund*innen

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

01.10.2016

Herausgeber

Ilya Shapiro

Verlag

TradeSelect - IPSUK

Seitenzahl

440

Maße (L/B/H)

22,6/15,3/2,3 cm

Gewicht

612 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-939709-86-8

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

01.10.2016

Herausgeber

Ilya Shapiro

Verlag

TradeSelect - IPSUK

Seitenzahl

440

Maße (L/B/H)

22,6/15,3/2,3 cm

Gewicht

612 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-939709-86-8

Herstelleradresse

Libri GmbH
Europaallee 1
36244 Bad Hersfeld
DE

Email: gpsr@libri.de

Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

Bewertungen (0)
Die Leseprobe wird geladen.
  • Produktbild: Cato Supreme Court Review
  • FOREWORD – The Review's publisher contrasts the reasoning of the chief justice in King v. Burwell and Obergefell v. Hodges. By Roger Pilon

    AFFORDABLE CARE ACT – King v. Burwell – Are tax credits available to individuals who purchase health insurance on the federal exchange? By Jonathan H. Adler & Michael F. Cannon

    AFFORDABLE CARE ACT – King v. Burwell – Broader issues relating to the “exchange established by the state” statutory debate, including federalism. By James F. Blumstein

    SAME SEX MARRIAGE – Obergefell v. Hodges – Does the Fourteenth Amendment require states to recognize and license same-sex marriages? By William Eskridge, Jr.

    RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION – EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch – Must employers inquire into individuals' religious preferences in order to provide accommodations? By Walter Olson

    RACIAL DISCRIMINATION – Texas Dept. of Housing & Comm. Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project – Are disparate-impact claims allowed under the Fair Housing Act? By Roger Clegg

    ANTITRUST AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING – N.C. Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC – The antitrust implications of state boards composed of industry participants. By Timothy Sandefur

    CRIMINAL STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Yates v. United States – Does Sarbanes-Oxley's anti-shredding provision apply to the disposal of fish? By John G. Malcolm

    PRIVACY – Los Angeles v. Patel – Can police departments inspect hotel-guest information on demand and without a warrant? By Luke Milligan

    environmental regulation – Michigan v. EPA – Must administrative agencies consider the costs of their rules before issuing them? By Andrew M. Grossman

    property rights – Horne v. Department of Agriculture – Must the government pay just compensation when it confiscates personal property (here, raisins)? By Michael W. McConnell

    Administrative procedure – Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assoc. – Is there a difference between “legislative” and “interpretive” rules under the Administrative Procedure Act? By Adam J. White

    DELEGATING LEGISLATIVE POWER – Dept. of Transportation v. Association of American Railroads – For purposes of regulating passenger railroad services, is Amtrak a governmental entity? By Alexander Volokh

    SPECIAL FEATURES INCLUDE

    MINIMALISM AND ITS LIMITS – In this written version of the 2014 B. Kenneth Simon Lecture in Constitutional Thought, Judge Diane S. Sykes examines minimalism as a theory of judicial decision making.

    LOOKING AHEAD – Noted Supreme Court advocate John P. Elwood outlines and predicts the 2015-2016 term.