Band 285
Linguistische Berichte Heft 285
Aus der Reihe
Linguistische Berichte
-
- Einzelkauf Download ausgewählt
-
Sprache:Deutsch
68,00 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Format
Kopierschutz
Nein
Family Sharing
Ja
Text-to-Speech
Nein
Erscheinungsdatum
06.03.2026
Herausgeber
Markus Steinbach + weitereVerlag
Helmut BuskeSeitenzahl
113 (Printausgabe)
Dateigröße
1693 KB
Auflage
Unverändertes eJournal der 1. Auflage von 2026
Sprache
Deutsch
EAN
9783691100341
Beiträge aus Forschung und Anwendung
- Linda Stark: Künstliche Intelligenz und Kommasetzung: Wie normkonform interpungieren KI-basierte Programme?
Abstract: The use of commas in German is an orthographic area in which deviations from the official standard and variants are frequently observed. They correspond to a pronounced uncertainty among human writers, which seems mostly to be due to the limited applicability of static grammatical knowledge. Since the application of grammatical knowledge is largely required to look up comma rules and put them into practice in an individual text, uncertain writers often lack help with their comma questions. For this problem, Artificial Intelligence (AI) seems to be a solution, as numerous freely available AI-based applications on the internet promise to correct punctuation in free written texts. This article presents an empirical study with 10 open-source AI (correction) tools: On the basis of a text with 386 comma positions it examines the extent to which these AI tools deliver on the promise of standard-compliant comma placement. By systemizing the observable deviations from the official standard, it is argued that the inves-tigated tools adhere - as well as humans do - to lexical text criteria when placing commas. This lexical view on comma placement helps explain why AI outperforms humans in some comma domains and underperforms in others.
- Si-Taek Yu: Die graphotaktische Funktion des Dehnungs-h im Deutschen
Abstract: This study proposes a novel theoretical interpretation of the so-called Dehnungs- in Ger-man orthography. In contrast to the traditional view that the grapheme merely marks vowel length, the analysis suggests that serves a structural purpose: it signals the non-syllabic realization of the following sonorant. This function accounts for the restriction that only one sonorant may follow and explains why sequences such as are inadmissible within monomorphemic words. The study argues that functions as a grapho-tactic boundary, blocking morphological extensions and preventing homonym formation be-tween monosyllabic and morphologically complex bisyllabic forms. Only when and the sonorant belong to different morphemes is a sequence like permissible. Thus, the study reveals a previously overlooked function of , aligning graphematic, phonological, and morphological constraints within a unified structural framework.
Praktisches aus Forschung und Lehre
- Ilka Lemke, Katharina Böhnert & Mario Voß: Schreiben vs. tippen - eine explorative Studie zur analogen und digitalen Kommasetzung von Mathematikstudierenden
Abstract: The present study explores the use of commas by students who did not receive explicit orthog-raphy instructions during their studies, comparing handwriting and keyboard typing as writing mediums. Twenty-two mathematics students participated in the study and were presented with two texts containing similar comma-sensitive passages via a dictation app. They then had to either handwrite or type these texts. The qualitative and descriptive statistical results show minimal differences regarding the writing medium: in the handwritten part, there are only more extreme variations in the correct placement of commas, both upwards and downwards. The evaluation of comma categories and type of comma-sensitive structures provided particu-larly interesting findings: in both writing conditions - handwriting and keyboard typing - prepositional groups were strikingly often separated by commas, seemingly for emphasis or as insertions. Syntactic Vorfeld structures were irregularly comma-sensitive; in some cases, especially infinitive groups were not correctly separated by commas.
- Linda Stark: Künstliche Intelligenz und Kommasetzung: Wie normkonform interpungieren KI-basierte Programme?
Abstract: The use of commas in German is an orthographic area in which deviations from the official standard and variants are frequently observed. They correspond to a pronounced uncertainty among human writers, which seems mostly to be due to the limited applicability of static grammatical knowledge. Since the application of grammatical knowledge is largely required to look up comma rules and put them into practice in an individual text, uncertain writers often lack help with their comma questions. For this problem, Artificial Intelligence (AI) seems to be a solution, as numerous freely available AI-based applications on the internet promise to correct punctuation in free written texts. This article presents an empirical study with 10 open-source AI (correction) tools: On the basis of a text with 386 comma positions it examines the extent to which these AI tools deliver on the promise of standard-compliant comma placement. By systemizing the observable deviations from the official standard, it is argued that the inves-tigated tools adhere - as well as humans do - to lexical text criteria when placing commas. This lexical view on comma placement helps explain why AI outperforms humans in some comma domains and underperforms in others.
- Si-Taek Yu: Die graphotaktische Funktion des Dehnungs-h im Deutschen
Abstract: This study proposes a novel theoretical interpretation of the so-called Dehnungs- in Ger-man orthography. In contrast to the traditional view that the grapheme merely marks vowel length, the analysis suggests that serves a structural purpose: it signals the non-syllabic realization of the following sonorant. This function accounts for the restriction that only one sonorant may follow and explains why sequences such as are inadmissible within monomorphemic words. The study argues that functions as a grapho-tactic boundary, blocking morphological extensions and preventing homonym formation be-tween monosyllabic and morphologically complex bisyllabic forms. Only when and the sonorant belong to different morphemes is a sequence like permissible. Thus, the study reveals a previously overlooked function of , aligning graphematic, phonological, and morphological constraints within a unified structural framework.
Praktisches aus Forschung und Lehre
- Ilka Lemke, Katharina Böhnert & Mario Voß: Schreiben vs. tippen - eine explorative Studie zur analogen und digitalen Kommasetzung von Mathematikstudierenden
Abstract: The present study explores the use of commas by students who did not receive explicit orthog-raphy instructions during their studies, comparing handwriting and keyboard typing as writing mediums. Twenty-two mathematics students participated in the study and were presented with two texts containing similar comma-sensitive passages via a dictation app. They then had to either handwrite or type these texts. The qualitative and descriptive statistical results show minimal differences regarding the writing medium: in the handwritten part, there are only more extreme variations in the correct placement of commas, both upwards and downwards. The evaluation of comma categories and type of comma-sensitive structures provided particu-larly interesting findings: in both writing conditions - handwriting and keyboard typing - prepositional groups were strikingly often separated by commas, seemingly for emphasis or as insertions. Syntactic Vorfeld structures were irregularly comma-sensitive; in some cases, especially infinitive groups were not correctly separated by commas.
Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.
Kurze Frage zu unserer Seite
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback
Wir nutzen Ihr Feedback, um unsere Produktseiten zu verbessern. Bitte haben Sie Verständnis, dass wir Ihnen keine Rückmeldung geben können. Falls Sie Kontakt mit uns aufnehmen möchten, können Sie sich aber gerne an unseren Kund*innenservice wenden.
zum Kundenservice