Produktbild: Landmark Cases in the Law of Punitive Damages

Landmark Cases in the Law of Punitive Damages

Aus der Reihe Landmark Cases

99,99 €

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei


Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

26.06.2025

Herausgeber

James Goudkamp + weitere

Verlag

Bloomsbury Academic

Seitenzahl

408

Maße (L/B/H)

23,4/15,6/2,2 cm

Gewicht

620 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-6704-9

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

26.06.2025

Herausgeber

Verlag

Bloomsbury Academic

Seitenzahl

408

Maße (L/B/H)

23,4/15,6/2,2 cm

Gewicht

620 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-6704-9

Herstelleradresse

Libri GmbH
Europaallee 1
36244 Bad Hersfeld
DE

Email: GPSR Kontakt

Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

Bewertungen (0)

Die Leseprobe wird geladen.
  • Produktbild: Landmark Cases in the Law of Punitive Damages
  • 1. Huckle v Money (1763): Exemplary Damages and Liberty of the Subject
    TT Arvind (University of York, UK) and Jenny Steele (University of York, UK)

    2. Wilkes v Wood (1763): General Warrants and Punitive Damages
    David Ibbetson (University of Cambridge, UK)

    3. Bell v Midland Railway Co (1861): The Curious Case of Disputing Directors
    Emily Gordon (University College London, UK)

    4. Rookes v Barnard (1964): 'Going off the Lines'
    Iain Field (University of Queensland, Australia)

    5. Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome (1972): Maritime, Generational and Judicial Clashes
    James Goudkamp (University of Oxford, UK)

    6. Lamb v Cotogno (1987): Insured Punishment
    Kit Barker (University of Queensland, Australia)

    7. German Federal Court of Justice, Judgment of 4 June 1992, Case IX ZR 149/91 (BGHZ 118, 312): German Law's Dilemma with Punitive Damages
    Johannes Ungerer (University of Oxford, UK)

    8. John v MGN Ltd (1995): Enclosing the Jury Paddock?
    Mark Lunney (King's College London, UK)

    9. Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998): Does the Criminal Punishment of the Defendant Bar Exemplary Damages? Questions Answered and Unanswered
    Felicity Maher (University of Western Australia, Australia)

    10. Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary (2001): A Milestone in the Expansion of Punitive Damages
    Eleni Katsampouka (King's College London, UK)

    11. Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co (2002): How Can Something So Wrong Feel So Right?
    Zoë Sinel (University of Western Ontario, Canada)

    12. Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd (2003): Equity, Penalties, Controversy and Costs
    Mark Leeming (University of Sydney, Australia)

    13. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell (2003): The Misguided Legacy of Proportionality
    Catherine M Sharkey (New York University, USA)

    14. Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc (2003): Judge Richard A Posner's Message and Method on Punitive Damages
    Ellen M Bublick (University of Arizona, USA)

    15. Couch v Attorney-General (No 2) (2010): The Susan Couch Litigation
    Stephen Todd (University of Canterbury, UK)

    15. Schlenzka & Langhorne v Fountaine Pajot (2010): The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Punitive Damages Awards in France
    Solène Rowan (King's College London, UK)

    17. PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd (2017): Orthodoxy Rules
    Pey Woan Lee (Singapore Management University, Singapore)