Rockets and Ray Guns: The Sci-Fi Science of the Cold War

“This slender paperback explores the contributions to fiction and reality by prescient novelists such as H. G. Wells, who foresaw atomic weapons in the early 20th century even as physicists were decoding the structure of the atom. … May alludes to several classic books, TV shows, and movies to illustrate the links between science and the intriguing and astounding predictions of fiction. Each chapter has references and pictures that edify the text. Summing Up: Recommended. All readers.” (N. Sadanand, Choice, Vol. 56 (5), January 2019)
“In Rockets and Rayguns, Andrew May draws on the parallels between reality and fiction, each influencing the other. … A solid contribution to the history of science fiction and its relation to the real world, alongside a reminder of Cold War technologies that now seem like something from a very distant past.” (Popular Science, popsciencebooks.blogspot.com, July, 2018)

“Rockets and Ray Guns: The Sci-Fi Science of the Cold War, explores the intersection of invention and fantasy — in this case, within the realm of science fiction — as it existed during one of the most productive time periods for both endeavors: the Cold War. … with an impressive amount of detail, including primary source illustrations from science and SF origins alike. … a work that will delight science, history, and SF buffs alike.” (Tom Reale, AIPT!, adventuresinpoortaste.com, July, 2018)
“This is an entertaining and enlightening read for anyone with an interest in science, technology and space exploration. The author’s extensive knowledge and multi-disciplinary approach to his subject matter is a refreshing change from the dry histories of the Cold War that concentrate upon the military, economic and political factors but often ignore the role of human imagination. The book is illustrated with pulp magazine and pop culture imagery.” (David Clarke, Fortean Times, Issue 372, 2018)
“This book will appeal to a broad audience of specialist historians of ideas, social science, and politics as well as to students in a wide range of fields. It also serves as a model for revisiting many other partnerships in the history of social science, where mutual collaboration has been put in the shade by falsely aggrandizing searches for individual ‘greatness.’” (E. Stina Lyon, Serendipities, Vol. 3 (1), 2018)