New methods for generating significance levels from multiply-imputed data
-
- Taschenbuch
- eBook ausgewählt
-
Form:Einzelkauf Download
-
Sprache:Englisch
36,99 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Format
Kopierschutz
Nein
Family Sharing
Nein
Text-to-Speech
Nein
Erscheinungsdatum
03.04.2018
Verlag
GRINSeitenzahl
103 (Printausgabe)
Dateigröße
814 KB
Auflage
1. Auflage
Sprache
Englisch
EAN
9783668674196
Doctoral Thesis / Dissertation from the year 2010 in the subject Mathematics - Statistics, grade: summa cum laude, University of Bamberg (Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften), language: English, abstract: Missing data are an ubiquitous problem in statistical analyses that has become an important research field in applied statistics. A highly useful technique to handle missing values in many settings is multiple imputation, that was first proposed by Rubin (1977, 1978) and extended in Rubin (1987). Due to the ongoing improvement in computer power in the last 10 years, multiple imputation has become a well known and often used tool in statistical analyses.
However, there still exists a problem in generally obtaining significance levels from multiply-imputed data, because the application of multiple imputation requires normally distributed or t-distributed complete-data estimators. Today there are basically three methods that extend the suggestions given in Rubin (1987). First, Li, Raghunathan, and Rubin (1991) proposed a procedure, where significance levels are created by computing a modified Wald-test statistic that is then referred to an F-distribution. This procedure is essentially calibrated and the loss of power due to a finite number of imputations is quite modest in cases likely to occur in practice. But this procedure requires access to the completed-data estimates and their variance-covariance matrices, that may not be available in practice with standard software. Second, Meng and Rubin (1992) proposed a complete-data two-stage-likelihood-ratio-test-based procedure that in large samples is equivalent to the previous one. This procedure requires access to the code for the calculation of the log-likelihood-ratio statistics. Common statistical software does not provide access to the code in their standard analyses routines. Third, Li, Meng, Raghunathan, and Rubin (1991) developed an improved version of a method in Rubin (1987) that only requires the chi-square-statistics from a usual complete-data Wald-test. This method is only approximately calibrated and has a substantial loss of power compared to the previous two.
To sum, there exist several procedures to generate significance levels in general from multiply-imputed data, but none of them has satisfactory applicability due to the facts mentioned above. Since many statistical analyses are based on hypothesis tests, especially on the Wald-test in regression analyses, it is very important to find a method that retains the advantages and overcomes the disadvantages of the existing procedures. Developing such a method was the aim of the present thesis.
However, there still exists a problem in generally obtaining significance levels from multiply-imputed data, because the application of multiple imputation requires normally distributed or t-distributed complete-data estimators. Today there are basically three methods that extend the suggestions given in Rubin (1987). First, Li, Raghunathan, and Rubin (1991) proposed a procedure, where significance levels are created by computing a modified Wald-test statistic that is then referred to an F-distribution. This procedure is essentially calibrated and the loss of power due to a finite number of imputations is quite modest in cases likely to occur in practice. But this procedure requires access to the completed-data estimates and their variance-covariance matrices, that may not be available in practice with standard software. Second, Meng and Rubin (1992) proposed a complete-data two-stage-likelihood-ratio-test-based procedure that in large samples is equivalent to the previous one. This procedure requires access to the code for the calculation of the log-likelihood-ratio statistics. Common statistical software does not provide access to the code in their standard analyses routines. Third, Li, Meng, Raghunathan, and Rubin (1991) developed an improved version of a method in Rubin (1987) that only requires the chi-square-statistics from a usual complete-data Wald-test. This method is only approximately calibrated and has a substantial loss of power compared to the previous two.
To sum, there exist several procedures to generate significance levels in general from multiply-imputed data, but none of them has satisfactory applicability due to the facts mentioned above. Since many statistical analyses are based on hypothesis tests, especially on the Wald-test in regression analyses, it is very important to find a method that retains the advantages and overcomes the disadvantages of the existing procedures. Developing such a method was the aim of the present thesis.
Kundinnen und Kunden meinen
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kund*innen durch Ihre Meinung
Kurze Frage zu unserer Seite
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback
Wir nutzen Ihr Feedback, um unsere Produktseiten zu verbessern. Bitte haben Sie Verständnis, dass wir Ihnen keine Rückmeldung geben können. Falls Sie Kontakt mit uns aufnehmen möchten, können Sie sich aber gerne an unseren Kund*innenservice wenden.
zum Kundenservice