• Produktbild: Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
  • Produktbild: Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

172,99 €

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei


Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

02.10.2014

Herausgeber

Davis Fergal F. + weitere

Verlag

Cambridge Academic

Seitenzahl

384

Maße (L/B/H)

23,5/15,7/2,5 cm

Gewicht

670 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-107-05361-8

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

02.10.2014

Herausgeber

Verlag

Cambridge Academic

Seitenzahl

384

Maße (L/B/H)

23,5/15,7/2,5 cm

Gewicht

670 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-107-05361-8

Herstelleradresse

Libri GmbH
Europaallee 1
36244 Bad Hersfeld
DE

Email: Libri GmbH

Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

Bewertungen (0)

Die Leseprobe wird geladen.
  • Produktbild: Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
  • Produktbild: Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
  • List of contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction. Counter-terrorism judicial review: beyond dichotomies Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras; Part I. Judging Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 1. Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism Fiona de Londras; 2. Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary Jens Elo Rytter; 3. When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgments David Jenkins; 4. The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience Jules Lobel; Part II. Beyond Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 5. Emergency law as administrative law Mark Tushnet; 6. The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny Fergal F. Davis; 7. Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom Jessie Blackbourn; 8. Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review Kent Roach; Part III. Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review in the Political Constitution: 9. Rebalancing the unbalanced constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom Roger Masterman; 10. Business as usual: deference in counter-terrorism rights review Cora Chan; 11. Deference and dialogue in the real-world counter-terrorism context Gavin Phillipson; Part IV. Internationalised Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 12. Counter-terrorism law and judicial review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union Cian C. Murphy; 13. Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court of Human Rights: a 'dialogic' approach to rights' protection or appeasement of national authorities? Helen Fenwick; 14. Accountability for counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts Helen Duffy; Index.