Produktbild: Unjust Enrichment and Public Law

Unjust Enrichment and Public Law A Comparative Study of England, France and the EU

141,99 €

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei


Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

30.06.2010

Verlag

Bloomsbury Academic

Seitenzahl

354

Maße (L/B/H)

23,4/15,6/2,1 cm

Gewicht

657 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-84113-414-7

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

30.06.2010

Verlag

Bloomsbury Academic

Seitenzahl

354

Maße (L/B/H)

23,4/15,6/2,1 cm

Gewicht

657 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-84113-414-7

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

0 Bewertungen

Informationen zu Bewertungen

Zur Abgabe einer Bewertung ist eine Anmeldung im Konto notwendig. Die Authentizität der Bewertungen wird von uns nicht überprüft. Wir behalten uns vor, Bewertungstexte, die unseren Richtlinien widersprechen, entsprechend zu kürzen oder zu löschen.

Die Bewertungen sind nach Format, Anzahl Sterne und Datum sortiert.

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kund*innen durch Ihre Meinung

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

0 Bewertungen filtern

Die Leseprobe wird geladen.
  • Produktbild: Unjust Enrichment and Public Law
  • Part 1 Unjust Enrichment and Public Law in England and Wales
    1-Definitions and Controversies
    'RESTITUTION' OR 'UNJUST ENRICHMENT'
    Using the Map
    The Criteria for a Claim in 'Autonomous' Unjust Enrichment
    'PUBLIC BODIES' AND 'PUBLIC LAW'
    CONCLUSION
    2-Woolwich and the Creation of the Public Law Reason for Restitution
    THE FACTS
    THE BACKGROUND TO THE CLAIM
    A WHOLLY PRIVATE APPROACH? POTENTIAL UNJUST FACTORS AVAILABLE TO THE WOOLWICH
    Duress or Colore Officii
    Inequality
    No Consideration
    Failure of Consideration
    Mistake of Law
    TWO NEW OPTIONS FOR RECOVERY
    WHAT IS THE WOOLWICH UNJUST FACTOR?
    Illegality
    Incapacity
    Absence or failure of basis
    Inequality
    A WHOLLY PUBLIC APPROACH: COULD RESTITUTION SIMPLY BE A RESPONSE TO A PUBLIC LAW EVENT?
    THE SOLUTION: A HYBRID APPROACH
    3-The Scope of the Public Law Reason for Restitution
    THE SCOPE OF THE PUBLIC LAW REASON FOR RESTITUTION: EIGHT KEY QUESTIONS
    Need There Have Been a Demand for the Public Law Reason for Restitution to Operate?
    Need There Have Been a Protest for the Public Law Reason for Restitution to Operate?
    To What Extent is the Public Law Reason for Restitution Overridden by Statute?
    What Exactly Does the Claimant Recover?
    Is it Always Necessary to Bring Two Separate Cases, One Action for Judicial Review and One Private Law Claim?
    Over What Subject Matter does the Public Law Reason for Restitution Extend?
    What Sort of Invalidity Triggers this Reason for Restitution?
    Which Kinds of Body Will Give Rise to this Reason for Restitution?
    THE SCOPE OF THE PUBLIC LAW UNJUST FACTOR: RESTITUTION FOR PUBLIC BODIES
    The 'Swaps' Cases
    4-A Hierarchy of Reasons for Restitution
    THE ADVANTAGES OF THE PUBLIC LAW REASON FOR RESTITUTION OVER THE PRIVATE LAW UNJUST FACTORS
    REASONS FOR RESTITUTION AND TIME LIMITS: IS A HIERARCHY POSSIBLE?
    Deutsche Morgan Grenfell v IRC
    FURTHER ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE HIERARCHY
    Does Mistake Provide a Broader Ground of Recovery than the Public Law Reason for Restitution?
    HOW WIDE ARE THE EFFECTS OF THE PUBLIC LAW REASON FOR RESTITUTION?
    How Wide is the Finding of Ultra Vires?
    How Far does a Claim in Unjust Enrichment Extend into Consequential Loss?
    EVIDENCE FOR THE HIERARCHY AND THE ISSUE OF 'CLOSED' SWAPS
    CONCLUSION
    5-Defences
    WHAT GENERAL IMPLICATIONS DOES THE HYBRID NATURE OF THE REASON FOR RESTITUTION HAVE FOR DEFENCES?
    TIME LIMITS
    PRIVATE LAW DEFENCES
    Change of Position
    Estoppel
    Bona Fide Purchase
    Impossibility of Counter-Restitution
    Submission to an Honest Claim
    Ultra Vires
    Passing On
    SPECIAL DEFENCES IN PUBLIC LAW UNJUST FACTOR CASES
    Fiscal Disruption
    The Law Commission's 'Special' Defence of Exhaustion of the Statutory Mechanism
    Prospective Overruling
    CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER IMPLICATIONS
    Part 1 Conclusions and further implications
    Part 2
    Unjust Enrichment and Public Law in France
    6-Public Body Unjust Enrichment Claims in France; Lessons for England and Wales
    THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE DIVIDE IN FRANCE
    THE FRENCH LAW OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT
    Enrichissement Sans Cause
    Répétition de l'indu
    Gestion d'affaires
    ENRICHMENT WITHOUT CAUSE AND PUBLIC BODIES
    Quasi-Contracts are Automatically Adjusted in their Application to Public Bodies
    If Courts Have to Choose Between Two Events, Both of which are Actually Relevant to the Basis of the Claim, Some Courts Will Choose One, and Others the Other
    As well as Adjusting its Quasi-Contracts to Take Account of Public Bodies, French Law Also Distinguishes between Public Law Rules and Public Law Procedure, so that even within the Private Procedure Adjustments can be Made to Take Account of the Public Nature of one of the Parties to the Claim
    The 'Absence of Cause' Approach does not Necessarily Provide a Better Solution for Public Body Enrichment Cases
    The Need to Accommodate Public Bodies in Private Claims has a Tendency to Change the Rules of Private Law Itself
    CONCLUSION
    Part 3
    Unjust Enrichment and Public Law in the European Union
    7-Unjust Enrichment and the EU Institutions
    AN EU LAW OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT?
    UNJUST ENRICHMENT AS A GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF EU LAW
    Staff Cases
    Annulment Cases
    Three Party Cases
    UNJUST ENRICHMENT: ONLY A 'GENERAL PRINCIPLE' OF EU LAW
    CONCLUSION
    8-Unjust Enrichment in National and European Law, and the 'Remedies' Jurisprudence of the ECJ
    HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RELEVANT EUROPEAN UNION LAW
    THE MEMBER STATE/EU DIVIDE: REMEDIES IN NATIONAL COURTS FOR BREACH OF EUROPEAN LAW
    The Principles of National Procedural Autonomy, Equivalence and Effectiveness, and the Three Phases of the ECJ's Case Law
    UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND ULTRA VIRES IN NATIONAL AND EU LAW; TWO DIFFERENT MODELS FOR ANALYSING THE DIVISION OF LABOUR BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES AND THE EU
    Two important factors against Model 2
    Cases in which a Member State or a National Intervention Agency Levies Money in Contravention of EU Law
    Cases in which an NIA or the EU Pays Out Money in Breach of EU Law which it then Seeks to Recover
    IS THERE AN EU LAW 'EVENT' OF ULTRA VIRES IN CASES INVOLVING BOTH EU AND NATIONAL LAW?
    CONCLUSION-THE IMPACT OF EU LAW ON NATIONAL UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIMS INVOLVING PUBLIC BODIES